1969 BMW 1600 vs. 2003 Citroen C
To start off, 2003 Citroen C is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 BMW 1600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 BMW 1600 would be higher. At 1,990 cc (4 cylinders), 1969 BMW 1600 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 BMW 1600 (98 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 2003 Citroen C. (58 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 BMW 1600 should accelerate faster than 2003 Citroen C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 BMW 1600 weights approximately 60 kg more than 2003 Citroen C. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1969 BMW 1600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 BMW 1600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Citroen C, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 BMW 1600 (160 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 66 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Citroen C. (94 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1969 BMW 1600 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Citroen C.
Compare all specifications:
1969 BMW 1600 | 2003 Citroen C | |
Make | BMW | Citroen |
Model | 1600 | C |
Year Released | 1969 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1990 cc | 1124 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 98 HP | 58 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 160 Nm | 94 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 89 mm | 72 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 69 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 10.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 996 kg | 936 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 3670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2320 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 46 L | 41 L |