1969 BMW 1600 vs. 2004 MCC Crossblade
To start off, 2004 MCC Crossblade is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 BMW 1600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 BMW 1600 would be higher. At 1,990 cc (4 cylinders), 1969 BMW 1600 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 BMW 1600 (98 HP) has 28 more horse power than 2004 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1969 BMW 1600 should accelerate faster than 2004 MCC Crossblade. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 BMW 1600 weights approximately 256 kg more than 2004 MCC Crossblade. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 BMW 1600 (160 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 58 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM). This means 1969 BMW 1600 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 MCC Crossblade.
Compare all specifications:
1969 BMW 1600 | 2004 MCC Crossblade | |
Make | BMW | MCC |
Model | 1600 | Crossblade |
Year Released | 1969 | 2004 |
Engine Size | 1990 cc | 599 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 98 HP | 70 HP |
Torque | 160 Nm | 102 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3210 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 996 kg | 740 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 2630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 1810 mm |