1969 BMW 1600 vs. 2011 Nissan Leaf
To start off, 2011 Nissan Leaf is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 BMW 1600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 BMW 1600 would be higher.
Because 1969 BMW 1600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 BMW 1600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Nissan Leaf, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 BMW 1600 | 2011 Nissan Leaf | |
Make | BMW | Nissan |
Model | 1600 | Leaf |
Year Released | 1969 | 2011 |
Body Type | Convertible | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Type | in-line | electric |
Horse Power | 98 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Electric |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 4445 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1549 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2700 mm |