1969 BMW 1600 vs. 2011 Nissan Micra
To start off, 2011 Nissan Micra is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 BMW 1600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 BMW 1600 would be higher. At 1,990 cc (4 cylinders), 1969 BMW 1600 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 BMW 1600 (98 HP) has 19 more horse power than 2011 Nissan Micra. (79 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1969 BMW 1600 should accelerate faster than 2011 Nissan Micra.
Because 1969 BMW 1600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 BMW 1600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Nissan Micra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 BMW 1600 (160 Nm) has 52 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Nissan Micra. (108 Nm). This means 1969 BMW 1600 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Nissan Micra.
Compare all specifications:
1969 BMW 1600 | 2011 Nissan Micra | |
Make | BMW | Nissan |
Model | 1600 | Micra |
Year Released | 1969 | 2011 |
Body Type | Convertible | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1990 cc | 1200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 98 HP | 79 HP |
Torque | 160 Nm | 108 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1666 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1514 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2449 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 46 L | 46 L |