1969 BMW 2000 vs. 1952 Jeep CJ3A
To start off, 1969 BMW 2000 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Jeep CJ3A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Jeep CJ3A would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Jeep CJ3A is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Jeep CJ3A weights approximately 10 kg more than 1969 BMW 2000.
Because 1952 Jeep CJ3A is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 BMW 2000. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1952 Jeep CJ3A will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 BMW 2000 | 1952 Jeep CJ3A | |
Make | BMW | Jeep |
Model | 2000 | CJ3A |
Year Released | 1969 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 2199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 59 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1110 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 3130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1460 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2040 mm |