1969 BMW 2000 vs. 1964 Triumph Vitesse
To start off, 1969 BMW 2000 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Triumph Vitesse. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Triumph Vitesse would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 1969 BMW 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 BMW 2000 weights approximately 220 kg more than 1964 Triumph Vitesse.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 BMW 2000 | 1964 Triumph Vitesse | |
Make | BMW | Triumph |
Model | 2000 | Vitesse |
Year Released | 1969 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 1594 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 70 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 880 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 3890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2270 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 29 L |