1969 BMW 2000 vs. 1965 Cadillac Sixty
To start off, 1969 BMW 2000 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 1015 kg more than 1969 BMW 2000.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 BMW 2000 | 1965 Cadillac Sixty | |
| Make | BMW | Cadillac |
| Model | 2000 | Sixty |
| Year Released | 1969 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1991 cc | 7029 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 208 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 2115 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 5790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1990 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 3390 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 95 L |
