1969 BMW 2000 vs. 1967 Cadillac DeVille
To start off, 1969 BMW 2000 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 895 kg more than 1969 BMW 2000.
Because 1969 BMW 2000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 BMW 2000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1967 Cadillac DeVille, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 BMW 2000 | 1967 Cadillac DeVille | |
| Make | BMW | Cadillac |
| Model | 2000 | DeVille |
| Year Released | 1969 | 1967 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1991 cc | 7029 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 208 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1995 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 5700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 2030 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 3300 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 82 L |
