1969 BMW 2000 vs. 1980 Cadillac Seville
To start off, 1980 Cadillac Seville is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 BMW 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 BMW 2000 would be higher. At 6,030 cc (8 cylinders), 1980 Cadillac Seville is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Cadillac Seville weights approximately 570 kg more than 1969 BMW 2000.
Because 1969 BMW 2000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 BMW 2000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Cadillac Seville, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 BMW 2000 | 1980 Cadillac Seville | |
Make | BMW | Cadillac |
Model | 2000 | Seville |
Year Released | 1969 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 6030 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 143 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1670 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 5210 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2900 mm |