1969 BMW 2000 vs. 2013 Dodge DURANGO
To start off, 2013 Dodge DURANGO is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 BMW 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 BMW 2000 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Dodge DURANGO is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Dodge DURANGO weights approximately 1129 kg more than 1969 BMW 2000.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 BMW 2000 | 2013 Dodge DURANGO | |
Make | BMW | Dodge |
Model | 2000 | DURANGO |
Year Released | 1969 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 286 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 2229 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 5075 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 2172 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1801 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 3042 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 93 L |