1969 BMW 2000 vs. 2013 Volvo C30
To start off, 2013 Volvo C30 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 BMW 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 BMW 2000 would be higher. At 2,500 cc (5 cylinders), 2013 Volvo C30 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Volvo C30 weights approximately 360 kg more than 1969 BMW 2000.
Because 1969 BMW 2000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 BMW 2000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Volvo C30, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 BMW 2000 | 2013 Volvo C30 | |
Make | BMW | Volvo |
Model | 2000 | C30 |
Year Released | 1969 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 224 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1460 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4266 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 2039 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1447 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2640 mm |