1969 BMW 2800 vs. 1996 Ford Aerostar
To start off, 1996 Ford Aerostar is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 BMW 2800. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 BMW 2800 would be higher. At 2,979 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Ford Aerostar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 BMW 2800 (170 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 37 more horse power than 1996 Ford Aerostar. (133 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 BMW 2800 should accelerate faster than 1996 Ford Aerostar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Ford Aerostar weights approximately 181 kg more than 1969 BMW 2800.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 BMW 2800 (236 Nm @ 3700 RPM) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Ford Aerostar. (217 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1969 BMW 2800 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Ford Aerostar.
Compare all specifications:
1969 BMW 2800 | 1996 Ford Aerostar | |
Make | BMW | Ford |
Model | 2800 | Aerostar |
Year Released | 1969 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2786 cc | 2979 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 170 HP | 133 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 236 Nm | 217 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1334 kg | 1515 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 4450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1860 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 3030 mm |