1969 BMW 2800 vs. 2002 Citroen C 15
To start off, 2002 Citroen C 15 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 BMW 2800. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 BMW 2800 would be higher. At 2,786 cc (6 cylinders), 1969 BMW 2800 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 BMW 2800 (170 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 113 more horse power than 2002 Citroen C 15. (57 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 BMW 2800 should accelerate faster than 2002 Citroen C 15. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 BMW 2800 weights approximately 389 kg more than 2002 Citroen C 15. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1969 BMW 2800 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 BMW 2800. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Citroen C 15, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 BMW 2800 (236 Nm @ 3700 RPM) has 123 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Citroen C 15. (113 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1969 BMW 2800 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Citroen C 15.
Compare all specifications:
1969 BMW 2800 | 2002 Citroen C 15 | |
Make | BMW | Citroen |
Model | 2800 | C 15 |
Year Released | 1969 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2786 cc | 1747 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 170 HP | 57 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 236 Nm | 113 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 23.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1334 kg | 945 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 4010 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 66 L |