1969 BMW 2800 vs. 2004 Dodge Neon
To start off, 2004 Dodge Neon is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 BMW 2800. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 BMW 2800 would be higher. At 2,786 cc (6 cylinders), 1969 BMW 2800 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 BMW 2800 (170 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 2004 Dodge Neon. (114 HP @ 5750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 BMW 2800 should accelerate faster than 2004 Dodge Neon.
Because 1969 BMW 2800 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 BMW 2800. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Dodge Neon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 BMW 2800 (236 Nm @ 3700 RPM) has 84 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Dodge Neon. (152 Nm @ 4900 RPM). This means 1969 BMW 2800 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Dodge Neon.
Compare all specifications:
1969 BMW 2800 | 2004 Dodge Neon | |
Make | BMW | Dodge |
Model | 2800 | Neon |
Year Released | 1969 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2786 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 170 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Torque | 236 Nm | 152 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 4900 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2650 mm |