1969 BMW 2800 vs. 2005 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2005 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 BMW 2800. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 BMW 2800 would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jeep Wrangler (190 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 1969 BMW 2800. (170 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1969 BMW 2800.
Because 2005 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 BMW 2800. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Jeep Wrangler (319 Nm) has 83 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 BMW 2800. (236 Nm). This means 2005 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 BMW 2800.
Compare all specifications:
1969 BMW 2800 | 2005 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | BMW | Jeep |
Model | 2800 | Wrangler |
Year Released | 1969 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2786 cc | 3966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 170 HP | 190 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 236 Nm | 319 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 99 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 8.8:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 4350 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 72 L |