1969 BMW 2800 vs. 2007 Renault Clio
To start off, 2007 Renault Clio is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 BMW 2800. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 BMW 2800 would be higher. At 2,786 cc (6 cylinders), 1969 BMW 2800 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Renault Clio (197 HP @ 7250 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 1969 BMW 2800. (170 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1969 BMW 2800.
Because 1969 BMW 2800 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 BMW 2800. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Renault Clio (292 Nm @ 5550 RPM) has 56 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 BMW 2800. (236 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2007 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 BMW 2800.
Compare all specifications:
1969 BMW 2800 | 2007 Renault Clio | |
Make | BMW | Renault |
Model | 2800 | Clio |
Year Released | 1969 | 2007 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2786 cc | 1999 cc |
Horse Power | 170 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 7250 RPM |
Torque | 236 Nm | 292 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 5550 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 82.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 93 mm |
Top Speed | 200 km/hour | 215 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1770 mm |