1969 Bristol 410 vs. 1946 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1969 Bristol 410 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,676 cc (8 cylinders), 1946 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1946 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 266 kg more than 1969 Bristol 410.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Bristol 410 | 1946 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | Bristol | Cadillac |
| Model | 410 | 62 |
| Year Released | 1969 | 1946 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5211 cc | 5676 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 215 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1600 kg | 1866 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 3280 mm |
