1969 Bristol 410 vs. 1968 Jensen FF
To start off, 1969 Bristol 410 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Jensen FF. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Jensen FF would be higher. At 6,276 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Jensen FF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Jensen FF (279 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 64 more horse power than 1969 Bristol 410. (215 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Jensen FF should accelerate faster than 1969 Bristol 410. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Jensen FF weights approximately 375 kg more than 1969 Bristol 410. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1968 Jensen FF (587 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 124 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Bristol 410. (463 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1968 Jensen FF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Bristol 410.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Bristol 410 | 1968 Jensen FF | |
Make | Bristol | Jensen |
Model | 410 | FF |
Year Released | 1969 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5211 cc | 6276 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 279 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 463 Nm | 587 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 99.4 mm | 108 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84.1 mm | 85.9 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1600 kg | 1975 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2780 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 81 L | 72 L |