1969 Bristol 410 vs. 1974 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1974 Triumph 2000 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Bristol 410. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Bristol 410 would be higher. At 5,211 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Bristol 410 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Bristol 410 (215 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 132 more horse power than 1974 Triumph 2000. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Bristol 410 should accelerate faster than 1974 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Bristol 410 weights approximately 355 kg more than 1974 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1969 Bristol 410 (463 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 328 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Triumph 2000. (135 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 1969 Bristol 410 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Bristol 410 | 1974 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Bristol | Triumph |
Model | 410 | 2000 |
Year Released | 1969 | 1974 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5211 cc | 1996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 463 Nm | 135 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 2900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1600 kg | 1245 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2700 mm |