1969 Bristol 410 vs. 1980 Opel Kadett
To start off, 1980 Opel Kadett is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Bristol 410. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Bristol 410 would be higher. At 5,211 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Bristol 410 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Bristol 410 weights approximately 815 kg more than 1980 Opel Kadett.
Because 1969 Bristol 410 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Bristol 410. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Opel Kadett, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1969 Bristol 410 has automatic transmission and 1980 Opel Kadett has manual transmission. 1980 Opel Kadett will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1969 Bristol 410 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Bristol 410 | 1980 Opel Kadett | |
Make | Bristol | Opel |
Model | 410 | Kadett |
Year Released | 1969 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5211 cc | 993 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1600 kg | 785 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4010 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2520 mm |