1969 Bristol 410 vs. 1985 Plymouth Reliant
To start off, 1985 Plymouth Reliant is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Bristol 410. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Bristol 410 would be higher. At 5,211 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Bristol 410 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Bristol 410 weights approximately 450 kg more than 1985 Plymouth Reliant.
Because 1969 Bristol 410 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Bristol 410. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Plymouth Reliant, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Bristol 410 | 1985 Plymouth Reliant | |
| Make | Bristol | Plymouth |
| Model | 410 | Reliant |
| Year Released | 1969 | 1985 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5211 cc | 2499 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 215 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1600 kg | 1150 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4550 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1740 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2260 mm |
