1969 Bristol 410 vs. 2003 Daewoo Magnus

To start off, 2003 Daewoo Magnus is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Bristol 410. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Bristol 410 would be higher. At 5,211 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Bristol 410 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Bristol 410 (215 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 86 more horse power than 2003 Daewoo Magnus. (129 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Bristol 410 should accelerate faster than 2003 Daewoo Magnus. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Bristol 410 weights approximately 50 kg more than 2003 Daewoo Magnus. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1969 Bristol 410 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Bristol 410. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Daewoo Magnus, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Bristol 410 (463 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 282 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Daewoo Magnus. (181 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 1969 Bristol 410 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Daewoo Magnus.

Compare all specifications:

1969 Bristol 410 2003 Daewoo Magnus
Make Bristol Daewoo
Model 410 Magnus
Year Released 1969 2003
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 5211 cc 1998 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 215 HP 129 HP
Engine RPM 4400 RPM 5400 RPM
Torque 463 Nm 181 Nm
Torque RPM 2800 RPM 4200 RPM
Engine Bore Size 99.4 mm 86.1 mm
Engine Stroke Size 84.1 mm 86 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.0:1 9.6:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1600 kg 1550 kg
Vehicle Length 4920 mm 4780 mm
Vehicle Width 1740 mm 1830 mm
Vehicle Height 1510 mm 1450 mm
Wheelbase Size 2910 mm 2710 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 81 L 65 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]