1969 Bristol 410 vs. 2005 Ford E-250
To start off, 2005 Ford E-250 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Bristol 410. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Bristol 410 would be higher. At 5,211 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Bristol 410 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford E-250 (225 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 1969 Bristol 410. (215 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford E-250 should accelerate faster than 1969 Bristol 410. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford E-250 weights approximately 704 kg more than 1969 Bristol 410. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1969 Bristol 410 (463 Nm) has 75 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Ford E-250. (388 Nm). This means 1969 Bristol 410 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Ford E-250.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Bristol 410 | 2005 Ford E-250 | |
| Make | Bristol | Ford |
| Model | 410 | E-250 |
| Year Released | 1969 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5211 cc | 4605 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 215 HP | 225 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 463 Nm | 388 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 99.4 mm | 90 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 84.1 mm | 90 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1600 kg | 2304 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 5390 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 2020 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 2120 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 3510 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 81 L | 132 L |
