1969 Bristol 410 vs. 2006 Honda Civic
To start off, 2006 Honda Civic is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Bristol 410. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Bristol 410 would be higher. At 5,211 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Bristol 410 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Bristol 410 (215 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 102 more horse power than 2006 Honda Civic. (113 HP @ 6300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Bristol 410 should accelerate faster than 2006 Honda Civic.
Because 1969 Bristol 410 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Bristol 410. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Honda Civic, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Bristol 410 (463 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 315 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Honda Civic. (148 Nm @ 4300 RPM). This means 1969 Bristol 410 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Honda Civic.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Bristol 410 | 2006 Honda Civic | |
Make | Bristol | Honda |
Model | 410 | Civic |
Year Released | 1969 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5211 cc | 1802 cc |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 113 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Torque | 463 Nm | 148 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 4300 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4490 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2710 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 81 L | 30 L |