1969 Bristol 410 vs. 2011 Holden Calais
To start off, 2011 Holden Calais is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Bristol 410. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Bristol 410 would be higher. At 5,211 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Bristol 410 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Holden Calais (278 HP) has 63 more horse power than 1969 Bristol 410. (215 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Holden Calais should accelerate faster than 1969 Bristol 410.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Bristol 410 (463 Nm) has 113 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Holden Calais. (350 Nm). This means 1969 Bristol 410 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Holden Calais.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Bristol 410 | 2011 Holden Calais | |
| Make | Bristol | Holden |
| Model | 410 | Calais |
| Year Released | 1969 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5211 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 215 HP | 278 HP |
| Torque | 463 Nm | 350 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
