1969 Bristol 411 vs. 1950 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1969 Bristol 411 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,286 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Bristol 411 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 72 kg more than 1969 Bristol 411.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Bristol 411 | 1950 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | Bristol | Cadillac |
| Model | 411 | 62 |
| Year Released | 1969 | 1950 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6286 cc | 5425 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 335 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1680 kg | 1752 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 2040 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 3210 mm |
