1969 Bristol 411 vs. 1982 Chrysler E

To start off, 1982 Chrysler E is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Bristol 411. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Bristol 411 would be higher. At 6,286 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Bristol 411 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Bristol 411 (335 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 194 more horse power than 1982 Chrysler E. (141 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Bristol 411 should accelerate faster than 1982 Chrysler E. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Bristol 411 weights approximately 435 kg more than 1982 Chrysler E. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1969 Bristol 411 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Bristol 411. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Chrysler E, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Bristol 411 (576 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 348 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Chrysler E. (228 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1969 Bristol 411 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Chrysler E.

Compare all specifications: