1969 Bristol 411 vs. 1982 Dodge Omni
To start off, 1982 Dodge Omni is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Bristol 411. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Bristol 411 would be higher. At 6,286 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Bristol 411 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Bristol 411 weights approximately 685 kg more than 1982 Dodge Omni.
Because 1969 Bristol 411 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Bristol 411. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Dodge Omni, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Bristol 411 | 1982 Dodge Omni | |
Make | Bristol | Dodge |
Model | 411 | Omni |
Year Released | 1969 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6286 cc | 1716 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 335 HP | 0 HP |
Top Speed | 230 km/hour | 146 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1680 kg | 995 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2530 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 49 L |