1969 Bristol 411 vs. 1997 Acura CL
To start off, 1997 Acura CL is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Bristol 411. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Bristol 411 would be higher. At 6,286 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Bristol 411 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Bristol 411 (335 HP) has 190 more horse power than 1997 Acura CL. (145 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Bristol 411 should accelerate faster than 1997 Acura CL. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Bristol 411 weights approximately 100 kg more than 1997 Acura CL. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1969 Bristol 411 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Bristol 411. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Acura CL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Bristol 411 | 1997 Acura CL | |
| Make | Bristol | Acura |
| Model | 411 | CL |
| Year Released | 1969 | 1997 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6286 cc | 2200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 335 HP | 145 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1680 kg | 1580 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4826 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1781 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1389 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2715 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 65 L |
