1969 Bristol 411 vs. 2002 Ford Econoline
To start off, 2002 Ford Econoline is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Bristol 411. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Bristol 411 would be higher. At 6,286 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Bristol 411 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Bristol 411 (335 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 137 more horse power than 2002 Ford Econoline. (198 HP @ 4700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Bristol 411 should accelerate faster than 2002 Ford Econoline. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford Econoline weights approximately 645 kg more than 1969 Bristol 411.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Bristol 411 (576 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 238 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Ford Econoline. (338 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 1969 Bristol 411 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Ford Econoline.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Bristol 411 | 2002 Ford Econoline | |
| Make | Bristol | Ford |
| Model | 411 | Econoline |
| Year Released | 1969 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6286 cc | 4195 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 335 HP | 198 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4700 RPM |
| Torque | 576 Nm | 338 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 2700 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1680 kg | 2325 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 5390 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 2020 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 2060 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 3510 mm |
