1969 Bristol 411 vs. 2003 Dodge Kahuna
To start off, 2003 Dodge Kahuna is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Bristol 411. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Bristol 411 would be higher. At 6,286 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Bristol 411 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Bristol 411 (335 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 123 more horse power than 2003 Dodge Kahuna. (212 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Bristol 411 should accelerate faster than 2003 Dodge Kahuna.
Because 1969 Bristol 411 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Bristol 411. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Dodge Kahuna, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Bristol 411 (576 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 237 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Dodge Kahuna. (339 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1969 Bristol 411 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Dodge Kahuna.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Bristol 411 | 2003 Dodge Kahuna | |
Make | Bristol | Dodge |
Model | 411 | Kahuna |
Year Released | 1969 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6286 cc | 2429 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 335 HP | 212 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 576 Nm | 339 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1710 mm |