1969 Bristol 411 vs. 2003 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2003 Ford Ecosport is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Bristol 411. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Bristol 411 would be higher. At 6,286 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Bristol 411 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Bristol 411 (335 HP) has 192 more horse power than 2003 Ford Ecosport. (143 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Bristol 411 should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford Ecosport.
Because 2003 Ford Ecosport is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Bristol 411. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ecosport will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Bristol 411 | 2003 Ford Ecosport | |
| Make | Bristol | Ford |
| Model | 411 | Ecosport |
| Year Released | 1969 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6286 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 335 HP | 143 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4228 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2490 mm |
