1969 Bristol 411 vs. 2006 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2006 Ford Ecosport is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Bristol 411. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Bristol 411 would be higher. At 6,286 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Bristol 411 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Bristol 411 (335 HP) has 268 more horse power than 2006 Ford Ecosport. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Bristol 411 should accelerate faster than 2006 Ford Ecosport.
Because 1969 Bristol 411 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Bristol 411. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1969 Bristol 411 has automatic transmission and 2006 Ford Ecosport has manual transmission. 2006 Ford Ecosport will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1969 Bristol 411 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Bristol 411 | 2006 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Bristol | Ford |
Model | 411 | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1969 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6286 cc | 1400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 335 HP | 67 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2490 mm |