1969 Bristol 411 vs. 2012 Daewoo Matiz
To start off, 2012 Daewoo Matiz is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Bristol 411. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Bristol 411 would be higher. At 6,286 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Bristol 411 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Bristol 411 (335 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 285 more horse power than 2012 Daewoo Matiz. (50 HP @ 5900 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Bristol 411 should accelerate faster than 2012 Daewoo Matiz. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Bristol 411 weights approximately 829 kg more than 2012 Daewoo Matiz. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1969 Bristol 411 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Bristol 411. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Daewoo Matiz, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Bristol 411 (576 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 507 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Daewoo Matiz. (69 Nm @ 4600 RPM). This means 1969 Bristol 411 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Daewoo Matiz. 1969 Bristol 411 has automatic transmission and 2012 Daewoo Matiz has manual transmission. 2012 Daewoo Matiz will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1969 Bristol 411 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Bristol 411 | 2012 Daewoo Matiz | |
Make | Bristol | Daewoo |
Model | 411 | Matiz |
Year Released | 1969 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6286 cc | 794 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 335 HP | 50 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5900 RPM |
Torque | 576 Nm | 69 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 108 mm | 68.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 85.9 mm | 72 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
Top Speed | 230 km/hour | 144 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1680 kg | 851 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 3500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2350 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 35 L |