1969 Buick GS vs. 2012 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2012 Jaguar XF is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Buick GS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Buick GS would be higher. At 5,724 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Buick GS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Jaguar XF (271 HP) has 81 more horse power than 1969 Buick GS. (190 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 1969 Buick GS.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Jaguar XF (600 Nm) has 205 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Buick GS. (395 Nm). This means 2012 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Buick GS. 2012 Jaguar XF has automatic transmission and 1969 Buick GS has manual transmission. 1969 Buick GS will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Jaguar XF will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Buick GS | 2012 Jaguar XF | |
Make | Buick | Jaguar |
Model | GS | XF |
Year Released | 1969 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5724 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 271 HP |
Torque | 395 Nm | 600 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
Vehicle Length | 5180 mm | 4961 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1877 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1461 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2908 mm |