1969 Cadillac Brougham vs. 1965 Lotus 33
To start off, 1969 Cadillac Brougham is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Lotus 33. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Lotus 33 would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Cadillac Brougham (228 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 1965 Lotus 33. (212 HP @ 10800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Cadillac Brougham should accelerate faster than 1965 Lotus 33. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 1724 kg more than 1965 Lotus 33. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Cadillac Brougham | 1965 Lotus 33 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Lotus |
| Model | Brougham | 33 |
| Year Released | 1969 | 1965 |
| Engine Size | 7734 cc | 1497 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 228 HP | 212 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 10800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 2180 kg | 456 kg |
