1969 Cadillac Brougham vs. 1967 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 1969 Cadillac Brougham is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Cadillac Brougham (228 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 135 more horse power than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Cadillac Brougham should accelerate faster than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 1240 kg more than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Cadillac Brougham | 1967 Mazda Cosmo | |
Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
Model | Brougham | Cosmo |
Year Released | 1969 | 1967 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7734 cc | 1964 cc |
Horse Power | 228 HP | 93 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2180 kg | 940 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5790 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1170 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3390 mm | 2210 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 57 L |