1969 Cadillac Brougham vs. 1974 Toyota Celica
To start off, 1974 Toyota Celica is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Cadillac Brougham (228 HP) has 143 more horse power than 1974 Toyota Celica. (85 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Cadillac Brougham should accelerate faster than 1974 Toyota Celica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 1210 kg more than 1974 Toyota Celica. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Cadillac Brougham | 1974 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Cadillac | Toyota |
Model | Brougham | Celica |
Year Released | 1969 | 1974 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7734 cc | 1588 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 228 HP | 85 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2180 kg | 970 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5790 mm | 4220 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3390 mm | 2430 mm |