1969 Cadillac Brougham vs. 1980 Volvo 240
To start off, 1980 Volvo 240 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Cadillac Brougham (228 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 76 more horse power than 1980 Volvo 240. (152 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Cadillac Brougham should accelerate faster than 1980 Volvo 240. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 740 kg more than 1980 Volvo 240. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Cadillac Brougham | 1980 Volvo 240 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Volvo |
| Model | Brougham | 240 |
| Year Released | 1969 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7734 cc | 1984 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 228 HP | 152 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2180 kg | 1440 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5790 mm | 4800 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3390 mm | 2650 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 60 L |
