1969 Cadillac Brougham vs. 1983 Zastava 102
To start off, 1983 Zastava 102 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Cadillac Brougham (228 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 179 more horse power than 1983 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Cadillac Brougham should accelerate faster than 1983 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 1410 kg more than 1983 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Cadillac Brougham | 1983 Zastava 102 | |
Make | Cadillac | Zastava |
Model | Brougham | 102 |
Year Released | 1969 | 1983 |
Engine Size | 7734 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 228 HP | 49 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 2180 kg | 770 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5790 mm | 3500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3390 mm | 2160 mm |