1969 Cadillac Brougham vs. 1992 Ford Ranger
To start off, 1992 Ford Ranger is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Cadillac Brougham (228 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 119 more horse power than 1992 Ford Ranger. (109 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Cadillac Brougham should accelerate faster than 1992 Ford Ranger.
Because 1992 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Cadillac Brougham. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Cadillac Brougham | 1992 Ford Ranger | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ford |
| Model | Brougham | Ranger |
| Year Released | 1969 | 1992 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7734 cc | 2298 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 228 HP | 109 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Length | 5790 mm | 4690 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1760 mm |
