1969 Cadillac Brougham vs. 1999 Chevrolet Impala
To start off, 1999 Chevrolet Impala is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 993 kg more than 1999 Chevrolet Impala.
Because 1969 Cadillac Brougham is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Cadillac Brougham. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Chevrolet Impala, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Cadillac Brougham | 1999 Chevrolet Impala | |
| Make | Cadillac | Chevrolet |
| Model | Brougham | Impala |
| Year Released | 1969 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7734 cc | 3786 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 228 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2180 kg | 1187 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5790 mm | 5090 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1860 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3390 mm | 2720 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 56 L |
