1969 Cadillac Brougham vs. 2003 Toyota Condor
To start off, 2003 Toyota Condor is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Cadillac Brougham (228 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 114 more horse power than 2003 Toyota Condor. (114 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Cadillac Brougham should accelerate faster than 2003 Toyota Condor. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 548 kg more than 2003 Toyota Condor. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 Toyota Condor is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Cadillac Brougham. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Toyota Condor will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Cadillac Brougham | 2003 Toyota Condor | |
Make | Cadillac | Toyota |
Model | Brougham | Condor |
Year Released | 1969 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7734 cc | 2438 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 228 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2180 kg | 1632 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3390 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 70 L |