1969 Cadillac Brougham vs. 2004 Fiat Stilo

To start off, 2004 Fiat Stilo is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Cadillac Brougham (228 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 134 more horse power than 2004 Fiat Stilo. (94 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Cadillac Brougham should accelerate faster than 2004 Fiat Stilo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 945 kg more than 2004 Fiat Stilo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1969 Cadillac Brougham is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Cadillac Brougham. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Fiat Stilo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1969 Cadillac Brougham 2004 Fiat Stilo
Make Cadillac Fiat
Model Brougham Stilo
Year Released 1969 2004
Body Type Sedan Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 7734 cc 1368 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 228 HP 94 HP
Engine RPM 4400 RPM 5800 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 3 doors
Vehicle Weight 2180 kg 1235 kg
Vehicle Length 5790 mm 4520 mm
Vehicle Width 2040 mm 1760 mm
Vehicle Height 1360 mm 1580 mm
Wheelbase Size 3390 mm 2610 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 79 L 58 L