1969 Cadillac Brougham vs. 2004 Ford F-250
To start off, 2004 Ford F-250 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford F-250 (260 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 1969 Cadillac Brougham. (228 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford F-250 should accelerate faster than 1969 Cadillac Brougham. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford F-250 weights approximately 759 kg more than 1969 Cadillac Brougham. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Ford F-250 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Cadillac Brougham. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Ford F-250 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Cadillac Brougham | 2004 Ford F-250 | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | Brougham | F-250 |
Year Released | 1969 | 2004 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7734 cc | 5408 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 228 HP | 260 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2180 kg | 2939 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5790 mm | 6250 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 2060 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3390 mm | 3970 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 110 L |