1969 Cadillac Brougham vs. 2006 Ford Escape
To start off, 2006 Ford Escape is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Cadillac Brougham (228 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 75 more horse power than 2006 Ford Escape. (153 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Cadillac Brougham should accelerate faster than 2006 Ford Escape. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford Escape weights approximately 676 kg more than 1969 Cadillac Brougham.
Because 1969 Cadillac Brougham is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Cadillac Brougham. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Escape, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Cadillac Brougham | 2006 Ford Escape | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | Brougham | Escape |
Year Released | 1969 | 2006 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7734 cc | 2262 cc |
Horse Power | 228 HP | 153 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2180 kg | 2856 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5790 mm | 4450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3390 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 62 L |