1969 Cadillac Brougham vs. 2006 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2006 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Land Rover Range Rover (305 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 77 more horse power than 1969 Cadillac Brougham. (228 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1969 Cadillac Brougham. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 780 kg more than 2006 Land Rover Range Rover.
Because 2006 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Cadillac Brougham. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Cadillac Brougham | 2006 Land Rover Range Rover | |
Make | Cadillac | Land Rover |
Model | Brougham | Range Rover |
Year Released | 1969 | 2006 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7734 cc | 4392 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 228 HP | 305 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2180 kg | 1400 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5790 mm | 4980 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1960 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1910 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3390 mm | 2880 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 104 L |