1969 Cadillac Brougham vs. 2007 Nissan 1400
To start off, 2007 Nissan 1400 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Cadillac Brougham (228 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 165 more horse power than 2007 Nissan 1400. (63 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Cadillac Brougham should accelerate faster than 2007 Nissan 1400.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Cadillac Brougham | 2007 Nissan 1400 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Nissan |
| Model | Brougham | 1400 |
| Year Released | 1969 | 2007 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7734 cc | 1397 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 228 HP | 63 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5790 mm | 3850 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1430 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1500 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3390 mm | 2310 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 45 L |
