1969 Cadillac Brougham vs. 2007 Renault Clio
To start off, 2007 Renault Clio is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Cadillac Brougham (228 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 2007 Renault Clio. (197 HP @ 7250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Cadillac Brougham should accelerate faster than 2007 Renault Clio.
Because 1969 Cadillac Brougham is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Cadillac Brougham. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Cadillac Brougham | 2007 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Cadillac | Renault |
| Model | Brougham | Clio |
| Year Released | 1969 | 2007 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7734 cc | 1999 cc |
| Horse Power | 228 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 7250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1770 mm |
