1969 Cadillac Brougham vs. 2008 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2008 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Cadillac Brougham (228 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 53 more horse power than 2008 Land Rover Range Rover. (175 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Cadillac Brougham should accelerate faster than 2008 Land Rover Range Rover. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 365 kg more than 1969 Cadillac Brougham.
Because 2008 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Cadillac Brougham. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Cadillac Brougham | 2008 Land Rover Range Rover | |
Make | Cadillac | Land Rover |
Model | Brougham | Range Rover |
Year Released | 1969 | 2008 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7734 cc | 2926 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 228 HP | 175 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2180 kg | 2545 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5790 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 2200 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1940 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3390 mm | 2890 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 104 L |